2004 Election
Bush and the Air National Guard
February
12, 2004. Great Britain’s The Guardian printed the
following:
… the
Bush administration's efforts to produce documentation that the
president did fulfill his duty in the Texas air national guard more
than 30 years ago were overwhelmed by a new round of damaging
disclosures.
Led
by USA Today, a number of US newspapers yesterday accused Mr.
Bush and his advisers of seeking to purge his military records before
his run for the presidency in 2000 to cover up any record of his
youthful arrests.
The
drip feed of new information about President Bush's stint in the
guard has confounded White House efforts to close a chapter on the
Vietnam war era.
Instead,
White House spokesmen have spent most of the week trying to satisfy
reporters' demands to explain the president's whereabouts during a
one-year period beginning in May 1972.
Hours
after the White House spokesman, Scott McClellan, released a record
of Mr Bush's annual dental examination at an Alabama air base, he was
forced to answer new allegations that Republican operatives had
doctored the president's military records.
In
the USA Today account, a senior member of the Texas air
national guard said that Republican operatives blacked out sections
of Mr. Bush's military records before the 2000 elections.
The
operatives apparently wanted to remove any reference to Mr. Bush's
youthful arrests.
Although
Mr Bush has admitted to being arrested twice for rowdiness,
violations for alcohol or drugs would have made him ineligible for
the national guard.
Meanwhile,
several members of the national guard have come forward to say they
have no recollection of seeing Mr. Bush in Alabama.
He has
previously said that he transferred his duties from Texas to Alabama
where he was working on a Senate election campaign.
"I don't
remember seeing him. That does not mean he was not there," Wayne
Rambo, who was a first lieutenant with the 187th Supply Squadron at
the time, told the Associated Press.
The
AP contacted more than a dozen former members of the unit on
Wednesday, and none could recall ever running into Mr. Bush
(Goldenberg, “Doubts” 1-3).
The
following is part of an article printed March 4 in The Guardian
that brought criticism of the Bush administration unrelated to
the Texas National Guard issue.
One
of the 30-second commercials includes a brief clip of a body, wrapped
in the American flag, being lifted from the wreckage of New York's
World Trade Centre. Firefighters, who emerged as heroes of the rescue
effort, also feature in the adverts.
But
the campaign appeared to have backfired badly today as relatives of
those killed on September 11 accused the president of exploiting the
tragedy to boost his political career.
"It's
a slap in the face of the murders of 3,000 people. It is
unconscionable," said Monica Gabrielle, whose husband died in
the attacks on the twin towers.
Tom
Roger, whose daughter was a flight attendant on American Airlines
Flight 11, said: "I would be less offended if he showed a
picture of himself in front of the Statue of Liberty. But to show the
horror of 9/11 in the background, that's just some advertising
agency's attempt to grab people by the throat," he told the New
York Daily News.
Firefighter
Tommy Fee called the adverts "sick", adding: "The
image of firefighters at Ground Zero should not be used for this
stuff, for politics."
The
intended message of the adverts is "steady leadership in times
of change". To stirring music, Mr Bush tells viewers: "I
know exactly what we need to do to make the world more free and
peaceful."
…
… in a speech
at a Republican fund-raiser in Los Angeles , … Mr Bush said the
19-year Senate veteran [John Kerry] had been "in Washington long
enough to take both sides on just about every issue".
He
said the election, which will be held in November, provided a choice
"between an America that leads the world with strength and
confidence, or an America that is uncertain in the face of danger"
(Staff 1-2).
A
September 10 Guardian
article narrated
how doubts about
George Bush’s service in the National Guard had evolved into a GOP
election crisis.
… memos,
apparently from the late Lieutenant Colonel Jerry Killian of the
Texas air national
guard, urged Mr Bush's replacement by "a
more seasoned pilot", because of his "failure to perform"
to the required standards.
A senior officer
had been "pushing to sugar-coat" Mr Bush's official
evaluation, the memos said, voicing a suspicion that the young pilot
had been "talking to someone upstairs" to facilitate his
eventual transfer to Alabama.
Mr. Bush
subsequently stopped showing up in Texas, but the Alabama unit's then
commander has claimed that he did not report for duty in that state
either. The White House insists that he did.
The
CBS TV network has obtained the documents. It also showed an
interview with a powerful Texas politician who said he had pulled
strings on behalf of a friend of the family to get Mr. Bush into the
national guard, so that he might avoid service in Vietnam.
"I
was maybe determining life or death, and that's not a power that I
want to have," said Ben Barnes, a former speaker of the Texas
house of representatives.
"I've
thought about it an awful lot. You walk through the Vietnam memorial,
and I tell you, you'll think about it a long time."
Mr. Barnes
confessed that he had abused his position of power in acceding to the
request from Sid Adger, an oil baron, to allow Mr. Bush to jump the
queue.
"I was a
young, ambitious politician, doing what I thought was acceptable,
that was important to make friends ... I would describe it as
preferential treatment," he said.
His story is
technically consistent with the Bush administration line that no
member of the family tried to exert improper influence.
But the
perception that the president drew on his connections is likely to be
strengthened by an advert due to be shown next week, paid for by a
group called Texans for Truth, questioning whether Mr. Bush ever
appeared at his Alabama unit.
Last
week, the widow of another family friend said the young Mr. Bush had
been sent to Alabama because he was "getting in trouble and
embarrassing the family" in Texas. The ad will provide a
campaign counterweight to efforts in recent weeks by Republican
supporters to cast doubt on John Kerry's war record.
Republicans lost
no time in suggesting that Texans for Truth might have direct links
to the Kerry campaign, nor in pointing out that Mr. Barnes was a
Democratic fundraiser and campaign adviser.
This would put a
new perspective on the Kerry campaign's stated intent to move beyond
Vietnam, to concentrate on domestic economic issues.
As
for Lt Col Killian's memos, said the president's spokesman, Dan
Bartlett, "I chalk it down to politics. They play dirty down in
Texas ... For anybody to try to interpret or presume they know what
somebody who is now dead was thinking in any of these memos - I think
is very difficult to do" (Burkeman
“Documents” 1-2).
Here
is part of a September 16 article printed in The Guardian.
The memos appear
to be signed by Lieutenant Colonel Jerry Killian, Mr Bush's commander
in the Texas Air National Guard, who died 20 years ago. They rail
against the young pilot and ambassador's son for failing to attend a
compulsory physical examination and complain about pressure from
senior officers to "sugar coat" his performance evaluation.
Since
their publication, several experts have questioned whether they could
have been produced on typewriters available at that time, although
the technical evidence is not conclusive.
Yesterday, to
cloud an already murky picture, Lt Col Killian's former secretary
declared that the documents were forged, but were factually correct.
"These are
not real. They're not what I typed, and I would have typed them for
him," the former secretary, Marian Carr Knox, told the Dallas
Morning News.
However, Ms Knox
added: "The information in here was correct, but it was picked
up from the real [documents]."
Both
she and another former colleague of Lt Col Killian, Richard Via,
recalled that he had kept careful notes on Mr Bush's shortcomings and
transgressions as a pilot and stored them in a locked filing cabinet,
the contents of which have since gone missing.
…
Senator Kerry's
aides argue their campaign has suffered because the US media has
focused more on sideshows such as the row over the documents than on
substantive issues such as Iraq, unemployment and healthcare.
They
also point out that the Democratic candidate's gaffes seem to get
more of an airing than those of the president. Last month, Senator
Kerry got the name of a stadium wrong in football-mad Wisconsin. His
mistake has been broadcast relentlessly since, even becoming the
subject of a Washington Post article yesterday, weeks after
the slip (Borger “Forgerry” 1-3).
The
Guardian’s narration
of the air national guard story was updated September
21.
CBS television
issued a humbling apology yesterday for a report on an investigative
programme, saying that its story claiming that George Bush had been
given special treatment during his stint in the Texas air national
guard was deeply flawed and should not have gone on air.
It abruptly
changed course after days of expressing confidence in the report on
“60 Minutes,” which relied heavily on four memos purportedly
written by a now dead commander in the guard to show that Mr Bush
received special treatment during his military service.
"Based
on what we now know, CBS News cannot prove that the documents are
authentic, which is the only acceptable journalistic standard to
justify using them in the report," a statement by the president
of CBS News, Andrew Heyward, said.
Dan Rather, the
anchorman who presented the story and defended it for nearly two
weeks, issued a separate apology.
"We
made a mistake in judgment and for that I am sorry," he said.
The statement
from Rather, an American television idol for 20 years, went on to
make the embarrassing admission that the programme's producers had
been duped by a disgrunted former member of the Texas national guard,
who had provided the documents.
The network did
not say the documents were forgeries, but after further investigation
of the story at the weekend Rather concluded: "I find we have
been misled on the key question of how our source for the documents
came into possession of these papers.
"That,
combined with some of the questions that have been raised in public
and in the press, leads me to a point where - if I knew then what I
know now - I would not have gone ahead with the story as it was
aired, and I certainly would not have used the documents in
question."
Since the
programme was shown on September 8, Rather has become a lightning rod
for Republican and right wing outrage, and the subject of
increasingly uncomfortable scrutiny by media commentators.
A
number of leading Republicans accused him of bias.
Yesterday he
said the reporting for the programme had been done in good faith.
The programme
was based primarily on four memos from the early 1970s, allegedly
from the private files of Mr Bush's squadron commander, Lieutenant
Colonel Jerry Killian.
In one of the
most damaging of the purported memos, the late Col Killian complained
that Mr Bush disobeyed a direct order to submit to a medical exam.
The story also
included a claim by a former Texas lieutenant governor, Ben Barnes,
that he had pulled strings to get Mr Bush into the guard, and so
spare him from being sent to Vietnam.
Within minutes
of the broadcast doubts about the documents began circulating on the
internet, claiming that the memos were fake.
Document
experts said that the print on the memos did not correspond to that
of the typewriters in use at the time but did seem suspiciously close
to Windows computer programmes.
CBS stood by its
story, even though two document specialists raised doubts about the
authenticity of the memos before the story went on air.
Although
Rather conceded in a report last week that the documents may appear
fake, he insisted that Col Killian's frustration with Mr Bush was all
too real, and he brought on the late commander's former secretary to
substantiate the assertion (Goldenberg “CBS” 1-3).
Works
cited:
Borger, Julian, “Forgery Row Threatens to Derail Kerry.” The Guardian. September 16, 2004. Web. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/sep/16/uselections2004.usa
Burkeman,
Oliver, “Documents
Put Bush's Vietnam Role Back on Election Agenda.” The Guardian,
September 10, 2004. Web.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/sep/10/uselections2004.usa1
Goldenberg, Suzanne, “Doubts about His Vietnam Record Dog Bush. The Guardian, February 12, 2004. Web. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/feb/13/uselections2004.usa
Goldenberg,
Suzanne, “CBS Apologises for ‘Mistaken’ Story of Bush’s
Military Service.” The Guardian, September 21, 2004. Web.
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2004/sep/21/tvnews.uselections2004
Staff
and Agencies, “Bush 9/11 Ads
Spark
Anger.”
The Guardian,
March 4, 2004. Web.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/mar/04/uselections2004.usa4
No comments:
Post a Comment