1588-1590 -- Drake's Failure, Raleigh's Decline, White's Dilemma
In late May 1588, while John White was recuperating in England  from wounds suffered aboard the Brave and his countrymen were anticipating
the arrival of King Philip’s great armada, a Spanish bark carrying 30 soldiers
left St. Augustine , Florida  , and headed north.  Its commander’s assignment was to search the
Atlantic coastline for an English settlement rumored to have been founded one, two,
or three years earlier.  Making
Chesapeake Bay landfalls in June, traveling up the Potomac and Susquehanna  Rivers  , the ship’s party found no
evidence of an English presence.  Battling
a fierce wind early during their return voyage, the crew dismasted the bark and
rowed it toward the shoreline of a long sandbar island.  Finding a shallow inlet (probably Port
Ferdinando), they entered an expansive, shallow sound.  Looking northward, they saw a great bay (the
entrance to Albemarle Sound), the wooded part of Roanoke
 Island , and a deeper inlet into the sound a league north of the
island.   On the east side of the
northern portion of the island they discovered a slipway (a shipyard) “for
small vessels and on land a number of wells made with English casks …, and
other debris indicating that a considerable number of people had been here”
(Quinn 308).  Finding no Englishmen
present, concluding that the settlement had been abandoned, the party sailed
for Florida  .  Had John White and the Brave actually gone to Roanoke  ,
the Brave and the Spanish bark might possibly
have found each other and fought.
After the Spanish Armada’s defeat in September, White sought
Walter Raleigh’s assistance.  Historian
Lee Miller believes that Raleigh  told the Queen that
sabotage was the motive of Simon Fernandez’s refusal to carry John White and his
colonists to the southern shore 
 of Chesapeake Bay   in 1587.
 Raleigh 
had to have known that his accusation would implicate Elizabeth  ’s very powerful secretary to state,
Francis Walsingham.  (See blog entry,
“1587-1588: Philip II Defeated, John White Thwarted,” fourth paragraph, June 1,
2014)  
Most likely, Raleigh  
made his allegation after the defeat of the Spanish Armada, when the Queen was
no longer fixated on the nation’s survival. 
Notwithstanding, doing so afterward was a dangerous action.  “With the victory celebration booming, Raleigh  ’s complaints
could only come as an unwelcomed distraction – ungrateful at best – amid the
patriotic fervor.  John White’s enemies
will roundly condemn him [White] as a liar. 
The whelp Essex and his faction are ever ready to denounce Raleigh   for his
recriminations, calling him an acerbic troublemaker whose combative nature
disrupts the peace of the Court.  He
takes too much credit for the defeat of the Armada.  He is too independent” (Miller 198).  More importantly, what might Walsingham do?  And how might the Queen react?  Did Raleigh  
consider thoroughly these predictable risks? 
Given his history of combating criticism with disdain, he probably
didn’t.  
Unlike other historians, who refuse to speculate what he may
have said, Lee Miller believes that Raleigh  
implicated Walsingham.  “Raleigh ’s
single defender is Leicester .  Yet soon after the Armada’s defeat, Leicester  is dead from a fever, which many suspect was
caused by poison.  Whatever the source of
Raleigh  ’s troubles,
there is no denying that he passed into a period of disfavor that has no other
ready explanation.  He speaks of errors made … Was accusing Walsingham
his error” (Miller 198)?
White and Raleigh must have had long conversations “about
the possibilities for doing something as soon as the war fervor had died down
and the prohibition on sailing had been removed” (Quinn 310-311).  Raleigh  probably
“introduced White to his business manager in London  , William Sanderson, and to the richest
promoters of the day, the two Thomas Smiths (or Smythes), who were father and
son” (Quinn 311).  Clearly out of favor
with the Queen, Raleigh  
had to disassociate himself from White’s enterprise so as not to damage him.
In November Essex fought a duel with Sir Charles Blount, a
handsome young courtier whom Elizabeth  
had given a golden chess queen, a token he wore tied to his arm with a crimson
ribbon.  In December, Essex, quarreling,
challenged Raleigh  
to a duel.  Raleigh   declined.  The Privy Council forbade it take place.  Hearing of it, Elizabeth   was very disturbed.  Essex 
remarked to the French ambassador, “’She takes pleasure in beholding such
quarrels among her servants,’ especially when they concerned herself” (Weir
402).
The crippled remnants of the 1588 Armada were being repaired
in the northern Spanish port  of Santander  and the Portuguese port  of Lisbon  .
 Spain 
had taken possession of Portugal  
in 1581.  Don Antonio, the pretender to
the Portuguese throne, had fled to England  .  Living in London  , he became one of Francis Drake’s
friends.  Antonio told Drake that the
Portuguese people were only waiting for his return to rise up and expel the
Spaniards.  Wanting to destroy Philip’s
preparations for a future invasion attempt, Elizabeth   sanctioned Drake’s ambitious expedition.  Drake’s intention was to smash Philip’s navy,
land Antonio and a military force in Portugal ,
pillage, incite a successful uprising, establish a permanent English base in
the Azores , and seize Spanish treasure ships.
Drake’s fleet, consisting ultimately of 150 ships, carrying
20,000 men, set sail April 18.  Living
well beyond his means and in debt for more than 23,000 pounds, Essex  had been desperate to be a participant.  Ships would be seized.  Booty would be collected.  He would be enriched.  And he would earn renown as a valiant soldier.  Why, he demanded, was Raleigh   to be a participant and he not?  The Queen was adamant.  Disguising himself, Essex galloped to Plymouth   and boarded a
ship that was to join Drake at sea.  Elizabeth   ordered two
ships to retrieve him.  Bad weather
prevented the ships from reaching him. 
The same bad weather impeded Drake.  “The ships were soon scattered by a series of
violent gales, and some thirty turned back. 
When the fleet regrouped on the north coast of Spain , the wind prevented it from reaching Santander  ” (Bawlf 235).  Drake sailed then to La Caruna.  Here, Drake had minor success, destroying 13
merchant ships in the harbor while General John Norreys (Norris) captured the
lower town, killing 500 Spaniards. 
Attempts to capture the fortified upper town failed.  The raid caught Spain   off-guard.  The days Drake spent at La Caruna, however,
gave Spanish forces time to strengthen their coastal defenses.  Lacking artillery, Norreys was unable to
capture Lisbon  .  Essex and Raleigh fought the enemy here with
distinction. Neither Norreys, Drake, Raleigh, nor Essex witnessed any Portuguese
uprising.  
By then, Drake’s campaign had suffered a heavy toll.  Disease had spread throughout his fleet.  Over 10,000 men would die from or be incapacitated
by it.  The plan to attempt a landing on
one of the islands of the Azores  was
abandoned.  Drake had only 2,000 men fit
for combat.  Norreys sailed for England   with
the sick and wounded.  Drake set out with
20 ships to hunt Spanish treasure ships. 
Struck by a heavy storm, his flag ship springing a leak, he turned about
and returned to Plymouth  .  Drake had lost about 40 ships, the investors
of the expedition were to take heavy losses, and the Queen was poorer by 49,000
pounds.  To punish Essex, Elizabeth  awarded Raleigh  
at Court a gold chain.  Essex ,
acting the role of returning hero, received nothing.  Even though she later excused his disobedient
behavior as “but a sally of youth,” Essex wrote a resentful letter to James VI
of Scotland , Elizabeth  ’s heir apparent.
The failure of William Sanderson’s holding company to
attempt to obtain ships and Elizabeth ’s
turbulent relationship with Essex  continued.  Again, Raleigh  
fell out of favor.  On August 15, Sir
Francis Allen wrote to Anthony Bacon, in France ,
that Essex had chased Raleigh  from the Court and
had “confined him to Ireland  .”  Raleigh  had
taken residence there to organize his estates; Elizabeth   had threatened to reclaim 42,000
acres of his holdings.  At a low point
emotionally, he composed a melancholy poem that included these lines: “As in a
country strange without companion/I only wail the wrong of death’s delays.”  (He made no mention in the poem of his having fathered
an illegitimate daughter)  At the end of 1589
Raleigh  was again in Elizabeth  ’s good graces.  It helped that Francis Walsingham had become
ill and would die April 6, 1590.  It
helped him even more that Essex had secretly married Walsingham’s widowed daughter
Frances and that Elizabeth  
was greatly upset.  
At the end of February White and a group of settlers arrived
in Plymouth   where
the ships were about to sail.  Abraham
Cocke refused to accept the settlers and their equipment.  Only White would be allowed to come
aboard!  White had no time to complain to
Raleigh or Sanderson, both of whom were in London  .  Lee Miller wrote: “What an incredible
choice!  White must know that if he
leaves England  without
supplies, his arrival on Roanoke  
will be as good as nothing.  Three years
wasted; he will return in exactly the same condition as when he left.  For this, he has spent agonizing years
braving famine and storms, ridicule and pirate attack.  He has been shot and wounded.  If he boards Watts ’s
ship now without supplies, he will only share the colonists’ fate.  …  Was
Walsingham behind it?  The decision might
well have been made before his death. 
Essex” (Miller 202)?  
White acquiesced.   
The Hopewell ,
the Little John, and the pinnace John Evangeliist left Plymouth   Harbor March 20.  The Moonlight,
delayed in sailing, would rendezvous with them in the Caribbean .
Sources cited:
Bawlf, Samuel.  Secret Voyage of Sir Francis Drake.  Vancouver ,
 British Columbia , Canada  .  2004. 
Print.
Miller, Lee. Roanoke  : Solving the Mystery of the Lost
Colony.  New
 York : Arcade  Publishing,
2001.  Print.
Quinn, David Beers.  Set Fair for Roanoke  . 
Chapel Hill and London : The University  of North Carolina   Press, 1985.  Print.
Weir, Alison.  Elizabeth   the Queen. 
London  :
Vintage Books, 1998.  Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment