Chicago Freedom Movement
Daunting Objectives
… the slums and ghettos of the mid-1960s are not accidents of
fate. They are the inevitable consequences of local (and not so
local) power structures practicing covert segregation and overt
hypocrisy to benefit their own wealth, power and privilege. …
CORE,
NAACP, Urban League, and scores of local civil rights, reform, and
economic justice groups have long struggled — with little success —
in northern ghettos against racist civic policies and entrenched
economic interests. Freedom Movement victories in the South have had
little impact in the North, and by mid-1966, impatience and fury in
the nation's inner-cities are rising fast.
In
Washington, Congress is in no mood for new civil rights or economic
justice legislation — its focus is "law and order" and
"White Backlash" politics. President Johnson's priority is
the Vietnam War, not the War on Poverty. Instead of increasing funds
to ameliorate urban misery, money once earmarked for social programs
is being diverted to the military budget.
And
even if Vietnam were not draining national wealth, by now it is clear
that federal poverty programs are mainly benefiting private
businesses in the form of grants, subsidies and tax breaks. And it is
middle-class professionals who are being employed by the research
firms, bureaus, agencies, and training centers that are paid for by
the federal poverty programs. Few poor people are being hired for
anything, and even fewer are being helped to actually lift themselves
out of poverty. LBJ's grand and ballyhooed "War on Poverty"
is proving to be an underfunded fraud.
Ever
since Birmingham, Movement supporters in the North have been pressing
Dr. King to apply his nonviolent direct action strategies to the
festering problems of northern ghettos, pleas that become even more
insistent after the Selma success. Watts forces the issue (After
1-2).
The
world sees Dr. King as a political leader of social/political
movements, but in his own heart he is a pastor. The misery and
suffering of those imprisoned in the urban ghettos cry out to him.
Since his student days he has been powerfully drawn to the social
ministry, to the poor, the downtrodden, the dispossessed and
disempowered. He passionately believes that nonviolent resistance is
the answer to oppression, exploitation, injustice, and despair —
not just in the American South, but everywhere.
Yet
for "everywhere" to actually be everywhere, it has to
include northern slums. He tells his SCLC colleagues, "I realize
I must more and more extend my work beyond the borders of the South,
and become involved to a much greater extent with the problems of the
urban North."
But
except for James Bevel and Andrew Young, SCLC leaders and key
advisors all oppose expanding out of the South. They argue that SCLC
has no base of churches or affiliates in the North, little experience
with issues of defacto rather than dejure segregation, and no
strategy for addressing pervasive covert discrimination or urban
poverty. …
SCLC's
southern affiliates all face urgent local problems with scant
resources, and the ministers & community groups who make up the
organization's Board of Directors desperately need help and support
from Atlanta. They know the organization can barely fund its southern
programs, it can't possibly finance a struggle on two broad fronts.
Moreover, most of SCLC's income now comes from northern white
liberals, some of whom have already turned against the Freedom
Movement because of Harlem and Watts. How many more will fall away if
the Movement begins to confront racism in their own backyard?
…
It
also means confronting white-only trade unions and long-standing
hiring and promotion standards that are deeply embedded in labor
contracts. These issues are all far more complex, and enormously more
controversial, than segregated lunch counters or denial of voting
rights. And when economic injustice becomes the focus, old allies may
turn out to be fierce new adversaries.
Dr.
King is well aware of the difficulties and risks inherent in a
northern campaign focused on poverty and economic justice. But the
Movement has to establish that racism and poverty are national issues
— not southern exceptions. Referring to Watts, he says, "[The]
ghetto Negro has been invisible so long and has become visible
through violence." Nonviolence has to effectively meet that
challenge. "We must find the real issues and examine our
structure to determine what we can do. ...
For
several years, the Freedom Movement in Chicago has been fighting
against rigidly segregated, deeply unequal schools, and an adamant
school administration committed to the old order and the old ways.
They urgently need substantial aid from King and SCLC. Over the
course of many months and many meetings, Dr. King eventually
convinces a very reluctant SCLC to answer Chicago's call (North
1-2).
It
is the policy of the Chicago Housing Authority (CHA) to build public
housing only in Black and Latino communities, usually in the form of
high-rise "projects" that in reality are vertical ghettos
for the very poorest. On a plot of land in the heart of the South
Side ghetto, for example, are the Robert Taylor Homes — the largest
public housing complex in the nation, consisting of 28 towers, each
16-stories high, containing 3,340 apartments.
Such
intense concentrations of extreme poverty foster despair, vandalism,
and crime. They overwhelm neighborhood elementary schools, and
quickly prove catastrophic for residents, the surrounding area, and
society at large. Nevertheless, CHA insists on building more of them.
In the view of many housing activists, the real reasons for
large-scale, tower-based projects are racist attitudes on the part of
white neighborhoods who refuse to accept nonwhites into their
communities and schools, and the lucrative construction and
maintenance contracts that go to politically well-connected
businesses — and the graft they kickback to the controlling
politicians.
Chicago
is the home and political base of Mayor Richard J. Daley, a major
power within the national Democratic Party who ruthlessly controls
one of the strongest urban "machines" in the nation. His
Cook County election apparatus is a sophisticated organization of
ward bosses, district and precinct captains, business interests (both
white and nonwhite), union officials, favored clergy, ethnic leaders,
and organized crime. All of whom reliably deliver overwhelming Black,
Latino, and white working-class majorities for Daley's candidates and
policies. So long as the machine can reliably mobilize Afro-Americans
at the ballot box, he can curry favor with white "ethnic"
voters by opposing civil rights initiatives such as school
desegregation and open housing.
…
SCLC strategists believe that confronting Daley is self-defeating.
"I don't consider Mayor Daley as an enemy," publicly avows
Dr. King who hopes that nonviolent direct action can persuade (or
pressure) the Mayor to support civil rights related reforms
(Segregation 1-3).
In
August of 1965, Dr. King sends Rev. James Bevel and a dozen or so
members of SCLC's small field staff to begin working in Chicago.
There they join Bernard LaFayette, Bevel's Nashville & Freedom
Ride "roll buddy," and a former SNCC organizer, who is
working for the American Friends Service Committee (AFSC) in the
city's West Side ghetto.
Their
assignment is to assist the Coordinating Council of Community
Organizations (CCCO) build a powerful, nonviolent, urban mass
movement. The CCCO is a loose coalition of 40 or so community and
civil rights groups who have been opposing Chicago's rigidly
segregated school system. …
Led
by Al Raby, the CCCO has fought for years against School
Superintendent Benjamin Willis and his policies of defacto
segregation. In 1963 and '64, they organized two huge school walkouts
with some 200,000 students boycotting classes. Yet despite its
efforts, CCCO has had little success. Willis is backed by Daley. And
the Johnson administration in Washington is unwilling to offend or
upset Daley by enforcing the school desegregation provisions of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964 — which Willis is violating. …
At
an SCLC-CCCO strategy meeting in October of 1965, SCLC Project
Director James Bevel defines the ultimate, long-range goal as,
"Getting rid of slums. [Our task] is not to patch up the ghetto,
but to abolish it."
Dr. King later recalled:
When
we first joined forces with the Coordinating Council of Community
Organizations, we outlined a drive to end slums. We viewed slums and
slumism as more than a problem of dilapidated, inadequate housing. We
understood them as the end product of domestic colonialism: slum
housing and slum schools, unemployment and underemployment,
segregated and inadequate education, welfare dependency and political
servitude. Because no single attack could hope to deal with this
overwhelming problem, we established a series of concurrent projects
aimed at each facet.
…
Over
three days of meetings in early January of 1966, SCLC and CCCO
leaders hammer out their strategy. At the urging of Bevel, and after
long and contentions debate, the CFM [Chicago Freedom Movement]
decides to shift focus from school segregation to a much broader,
more general, "War on Slums."
In
a 13-page strategy document, they outline a three-phase plan: Phase
One (already underway) is organizing tenant unions and forming other
community groups, educating supporters and opinion makers, recruiting
and training nonviolent demonstrators. Phase Two, expected to begin
in March, is to consist of creative nonviolent protests exposing the
agents of discrimination and exploitation and educating the public
about poverty and suffering in the ghettos. Phase Three, scheduled
for May, is large-scale direct action and mass civil disobedience to
achieve a "direct confrontation [between] the power of the
existing social order and the newly acquired power of the combined
forces of good-will and the under-privileged."
…
King
tells reporters, "Our work will be aimed at Washington,"
for an expanded War on Poverty and open-housing legislation. But so
long as "Law & Order" ideology and the Vietnam War
dominate politics and budgets, the chances of prodding the nation to,
"rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed," are
poor (Chicago 1-5).
It
was bitterly cold on January 26, 1966, the day Martin Luther King Jr.
and his wife, Coretta, moved into a $90-a-month railroad flat on the
top floor of a rundown building on the corner of Hamlin Avenue and
16th Street. The North Lawndale tenement, which stood two blocks from
a pool hall that served as headquarters for the Vice Lords street
gang, had no lock on its front door and a packed-dirt floor in the
foyer.
…
King’s
decision to come to Chicago owed in large part to the efforts of two
men: Albert Raby [of the CCCO] … and James Bevel [who]
… had recently moved to Chicago with his wife, Diane Nash, a native
South Sider, and started working at the West Side Christian Parish,
an outreach ministry across from Union Park.
Raby
and Bevel convinced King that Chicago would be the ideal beachhead:
It was a huge city with a substantial black population, and unlike
New York and Philadelphia, where influential black leaders let it be
known to King privately that they didn’t need or want him, Chicago
had a coalition—led by Raby and Bevel—ready to welcome him with
open arms. And then there was Chicago’s mayor. Richard J. Daley
controlled virtually every lever of power in the city. Persuade Daley
of the rightness of change, Bevel and others argued, and the whole
city would change along with him. Change Chicago, and the rest of the
country would follow.
“We’ve
got to go for broke,” Bevel told King. After the Watts riots, King
didn’t need much convincing.
The
task of finding King a place to live fell to his assistant, Bernard
Lee. King had expressed a desire to live on the West Side. “You
can’t really get close to the poor without living and being here
with them,” King told reporters. “A West Side apartment will
symbolize the slum-lordism that I hope to smash.”
Lee
and a young secretary named Diana Smith, who had grown up in North
Lawndale, posed as a house-hunting couple and, after a week of
looking at apartments in and around that neighborhood, settled on the
flat at 1550 South Hamlin Avenue. Lee signed the lease before the
landlord realized who the real occupant would be. Once he did, he
promptly sent over a crew of plasterers, painters, and electricians
to fix up the apartment.
“For
a long time there was a joke that all Martin Luther King had to do
was to move from one building to another on the West Side, and the
whole place could get cleaned up in a hurry,” recalls Mary Lou
Finley, who co-edited a recent book on the Chicago Freedom Movement.
Finley, who is white, was just out of Stanford in 1965 and was given
the job of picking out furniture from a church-run thrift shop for
the Kings’ two-bedroom apartment. She remembers clearly the tiny
kitchen with the refrigerator that didn’t keep food cold and the
dilapidated gas stove that didn’t keep it hot.
Coretta
Scott King recalled the flat in her memoir, My Life with Martin
Luther King, Jr.: “Our apartment was on the third floor of a
dingy building, which had no lights in the hall, only one dim bulb at
the head of the stairs. … As we walked in … the smell of urine
was overpowering. We were told that this was because the door was
always open, and the drunks came in off the street to use the hallway
as a toilet.”
The
Kings’ apartment was right off a violent stretch of 16th Street, in
a part of North Lawndale nicknamed the Holy City—holy because it
was where the Vice Lords, one of Chicago’s largest and fiercest
gangs, had gotten its start. “In all of my time in the movement all
across the South, the only time I was scared was in that
neighborhood, going to my apartment at night,” recalls Andrew
Young, the former congressman, U.N. ambassador, and mayor of Atlanta,
who as a young activist accompanied King to Chicago to help launch
the campaign. “I said, ‘I don’t mind giving my life in the
civil rights movement, but damn if I want to have a knife stuck in me
for 20 dollars in a dark hallway.’ ”
Most
of the businesses in this part of the West Side—grocery and liquor
stores, payday loan shops, and the like—were owned by whites, many
of whom had lived in the neighborhood before blacks moved in. (In
1950, North Lawndale was 87 percent white. A decade later, it was
more than 90 percent black.) Customers in these neighborhoods almost
always paid more for less. Says Finley: “I remember going to a
grocery store and finding Grade B eggs. Never in my life had I seen
Grade B eggs anywhere! And they cost the same as Grade A or AA eggs
in other grocery stores.” One day, she recalls, a colleague
followed a delivery truck that picked up boxes of expired potato
chips from a suburban supermarket and brought them to grocery stores
on the West Side. “The ghetto was a dumping ground,” says Finley.
After
getting settled in the Hamlin Avenue flat, King established a routine
of strolling around the neighborhood. On his walks, he saw up close
the sense of hopelessness, despair, and anger—what he referred to
as an “emotional pressure cooker”—to which the Watts riots had
so violently borne testament (Bernstein 10-12).
Works
cited:
“After
Watts.” Chicago Freedom Movement & the War Against Slums.
Civil Rights Movement History 1966 (July-December). Web.
https://www.crmvet.org/tim/tim66b.htm#1966chi_watts
Bernstein, David.
“The Longest March.” Politics & City Life. July 25,
2016. Web.
https://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/August-2016/Martin-Luther-King-Chicago-Freedom-Movement/
“Chicago
Freedom Movement.” Chicago Freedom Movement & the War
Against Slums. Civil Rights Movement History 1966 (July-December).
Web. https://www.crmvet.org/tim/tim66b.htm#1966chi_watts
“North
to Chicago.” Chicago Freedom Movement & the War Against
Slums. Civil Rights Movement History 1966 (July-December). Web.
https://www.crmvet.org/tim/tim66b.htm#1966chi_watts
“Segregation
– Chicago Style.” Chicago Freedom Movement & the War
Against Slums. Civil Rights Movement History 1966 (July-December).
Web. https://www.crmvet.org/tim/tim66b.htm#1966chi_watts
“The
Chicago Freedom Movement.” National Low Income Housing
Coalition. October 23, 2018. Web.
https://nlihc.org/resource/chicago-freedom-movement
No comments:
Post a Comment