Civil Rights Events
Birmingham 1963
SCLC Comes to Town
President F. Roosevelt issued Executive Order
8802 in 1941 and integrated industries that supplied the WWII effort. For the
first time, African Americans were able to work alongside their White
counterparts, and were eligible for promotions to supervisory positions.
However, this also made Birmingham
a battle ground where the antebellum past and the Civil Rights Movement
collided in violence and protest.
The more African Americans moved into the
middle class, and in turn began to live middle class lifestyles, the City of Birmingham dug their
heels in to prevent their progress. The Ku Klux Klan (KKK) had a long standing
hold on the city, and it was their job to reinforce the social mores that
governed everyone. African Americans needed to remember their place, and in
times when they asserted their rights and ventured outside of the social caste
system created for them, there was violence (Harris 1).
Martin
Luther King described Birmingham as “America ’s
worst city for racism. … the KKK had
castrated an African American; [had actually] pressured the city to ban a book
from book stores as it contained pictures of black and white rabbits and wanted
black music banned on radio stations” (Trueman 1).
For decades Birmingham had represented the citadel of
white supremacy. No black resident was ever secure from the wide sweep of
racist terrorism, both institutionalized and vigilante. Conditions in the state
had become even worse with the election of Governor George Wallace in 1962, who
stated upon taking his oath of office, "I say segregation now, segregation
tomorrow, segregation forever." Wallace vowed that the federal government
would not dictate racial policies in his state. For years, civil rights activists
had conceived of plans to attack Birmingham 's
Jim Crow laws; now it seemed the utmost priority (Birmingham Desegregation 1).
Reverend
Fred Shuttlesworth had fought the segregated system for more than a
decade.
Having witnessed the organization of
the Montgomery Bus Boycott, Shuttlesworth organized his own group, the Alabama
Christian Movement for Human Rights (ACMHR), in June 1956 after the state
outlawed the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. In
December 1956, when the federal courts ordered the desegregation of Montgomery 's buses, Shuttlesworth asked the officials of Birmingham 's transit
system to end segregated seating, setting a December 26 deadline. He intended to challenge the laws on a bus on
that day, but on the night of December 25, Klansmen bombed Bethel Baptist
Church and parsonage,
nearly assassinating Shuttlesworth (Eskew 1).
They blew the floor out from under
my bed, spaces I guess 15 feet. The springs I was lying on, we never found. I
walked out from this and instead of running away from the blast, running away
from the Klansmen, I said to the Klansmen police that came, he said,
"Reverend, if I were you, I'd get out of town as fast as I could." I
said, "Officer, you're not me. You go back and tell your Klan brethren
that if God could keep me through this, then I'm here for the duration." I
think that's what gave people the feeling that I wouldn't run, I didn't run,
and that God had to be there (Walk 1).
Shuttlesworth emerged out of the rubble of his dynamited
house and led a protest the next morning that resulted in a legal case against
the city's segregation ordinance.
Coinciding with school desegregation
in Little Rock , Arkansas ,
Shuttlesworth arranged a challenge to Birmingham 's
all-white Phillips
High School in September 1957,
nearly suffering death at the hands of an angry mob. Segregationist vigilantes
again greeted Shuttlesworth when he desegregated the train station. In 1958,
Shuttlesworth organized a boycott of Birmingham 's
buses in support of the ACMHR legal case against segregated seating.
Shuttlesworth's aggressive strategy of direct action alienated him from Birmingham 's established
black leadership. Many people in the black middle class found as too extreme
the intense religious belief held by ACMHR members that God was going to end
segregation.
Prompted by the national sit-in
movement begun by four black college men in Greensboro ,
North Carolina , in February 1960, a group of
black students in Birmingham from Miles College
and Daniel Payne College
held a prayer vigil. Shuttlesworth and the ACMHR supported their efforts. When
a national group of black and white demonstrators undertook the Freedom Rides
in May 1961, Shuttlesworth and the ACMHR provided assistance, rescuing the
stranded protesters outside Anniston as well as
those who suffered a Klan attack at the Birmingham
Trailways Station. In spring 1962, Birmingham 's
black college students initiated the Selective Buying Campaign and, with
support from Shuttlesworth and ACMHR, it became the catalyst for the spring 1963
demonstrations.
Chosen as secretary of the Southern
Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) when it organized in 1957,
Shutttlesworth had been an active member of the region's leading civil rights
group. But he was frustrated because he believed that the SCLC lacked clear
direction under King's leadership. Shuttlesworth watched the SCLC intervene in
Albany, Georgia, in 1961 and fail to successfully challenge segregation in a
manner that forced reforms in local race relations. Aware that King's reputation
had suffered from this defeat, Shuttlesworth invited the SCLC to assist him and
the ACMHR in Birmingham .
Believing that a success would restore his reputation as a national civil
rights leader, King agreed. Shuttlesworth hoped King's prestige would attract
the black masses and thus mobilize Birmingham 's
black community behind the joint ACMHR-SCLC campaign (Eskew 2-3).
In April 1963 King and
the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) joined with Birmingham,
Alabama’s existing local movement, the Alabama Christian Movement for Human
Rights (ACMHR), in a massive direct action campaign to attack the city’s
segregation system by putting pressure on Birmingham’s merchants during the
Easter season, the second biggest shopping season of the year. As ACMHR founder
Fred Shuttlesworth stated in the group’s “Birmingham
Manifesto,” the campaign was “a moral witness to give our community a chance to
survive” (Birmingham Campaign 1).
As 1963 began, Martin
Luther King, Jr., and the SCLC were coming off a campaign in Albany ,
Georgia , which the New York Herald Tribune
called "one of the most stunning defeats of King's career." SCLC had
spent over a year in Albany
attempting to integrate the city's public facilities. Although the president of
the Albany
Movement, Dr. William Anderson, said that the campaign was "an
overwhelming success, in that there was a change in the attitude of the people
involved," King felt that, "we got nothing." The schools
remained segregated; the city parks were closed to avoid integration; the
libraries were integrated, but only after all the chairs were removed. SCLC
official Andrew Young remembered King as being "very depressed." He
was looking to start another campaign, and he badly needed a victory (Cozzens
1).
Leaders from the ACMHR met with SCLC officials
to plan strategy. Having learned from prior mistakes, King's lieutenant, the
Reverend Wyatt Tee Walker, proposed a limited campaign of sit-ins and pickets
designed to pressure merchants and local business leaders into demanding the
city commission repeal the municipal segregation ordinances (Eskew 4).
Interviewed
by Eyes on the Prize years later, Walker
revealed his detailed planning. : Learning by the Albany circumstance, I targeted three stores. … And since the 16th Street Baptist Church
was going to be our headquarters, I had it timed as to how long it took a
youngster to walk down there, how long it would take an older person to walk
down there, how long it would take a middle aged person to walk down there. And
I picked out what would be the best routes. Under some subterfuge, I visited
all three of these stores and counted the stools, the tables, the chairs, etc.,
and what the best method of ingress and egress was (Walk 2).
Twenty-one demonstrators were arrested on April 2, the first
day of protest. Until the courts decided
which city government was the legal one, Bull Connor remained in charge of the
police and fire departments. Connor adopted Albany sheriff Laurie Pritchett’s restraint
in making arrests. Actions expanded to
kneel-ins at churches, sit-ins at the library, and a march on the county
building to register voters. Hundreds were arrested.
…
Shuttlesworth led the first of many protest
marches on City Hall to emphasize the refusal of the city commission to issue
parade permits to the protestors. As the number of demonstrations increased,
police arrested more ACMHR members, consequently draining the financial
resources of the campaign. Black bystanders gave the campaign the appearance of
mass support, but the vast majority of Birmingham 's
black residents remained uninvolved. A more serious threat came from
established black leaders who opposed the civil rights campaign and actively
worked to undermine Shuttlesworth by negotiating with the white power structure
(Eskew 4-5).
Moderate
White lawyer David Vann told his Eyes on the Prize interviewer: “I was
upset with Dr. King because he wouldn't give us a chance to prove what we could
do through the political processes. And a year and a day after Connor had been
elected with the largest vote in history, a majority of the people of this city
voted to terminate his office. And when he ran for mayor, they rejected him”
(Walk 3)
The Kennedy administration also thought that the
demonstrations were ill-timed.
On April 10th, Birmingham obtained a state court injunction,
ordering an end to the demonstrations. Discouraged, Dr. King worried that the
campaign, as in Albany ,
would stall. Interviewed by Eyes of the
Prize, Andrew Young revealed the movement’s situation.
We had
about five or six hundred people in jail, but all the money was gone and we
couldn't get people out of jail. And the business community, black business
community and some of the white clergy, were pressuring us to call off the
demonstrations and just get out of town. And we didn't know what to do. And he
sat there in room 30 in the Gaston Motel and Martin didn't say anything. And
then finally, he got up and he went in the bedroom and he came back with his
blue jeans on and his jacket and he said, "Look," he said, "I
don't know what to do. I just know that something has got to change in Birmingham . I don't know
whether I can raise money to get people out of jail. I do know that I can go
into jail with them." And not knowing how it's going to work out, he
walked out of the room and led his demonstration and went to jail.
Local white clergy were criticizing King and the
campaign. Young reported: The ministers published in the newspapers a
diatribe against Martin calling him a troublemaker and saying that he was there
stirring up trouble to get publicity. And he sat down and took that newspaper
and he had no paper, and he was in solitary confinement. And he started writing
an answer to that one page ad around the margins of the New York Times (Walk 4-5). His rebuttal, titled “Letter from Birmingham
Jail,” was subsequently printed in newspapers across the country.
King made salient points.
I am in Birmingham because
injustice is here.
…
Anyone who lives
inside the United States
can never be considered an outsider anywhere within its bounds.
…
There can be no
gainsaying the fact that racial injustice engulfs this community. Birmingham is probably the most thoroughly segregated city
in the United States .
Its ugly record of brutality is widely known. Negroes have experienced grossly
unjust treatment in the courts. There have been more unsolved bombings of Negro
homes and churches in Birmingham
than in any other city in the nation. These are the hard, brutal facts of the
case. On the basis of these conditions, Negro leaders sought to negotiate with
the city fathers. But the latter consistently refused to engage in good faith
negotiation.
…
Nonviolent direct
action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community
which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue. It
seeks so to dramatize the issue that it can no longer be ignored. … The purpose of our direct action program is
to create a situation so crisis packed that it will inevitably open the door to
negotiation.
We know through
painful experience that freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it
must be demanded by the oppressed. Frankly, I have yet to engage in a direct
action campaign that was "well timed" in the view of those who have
not suffered unduly from the disease of segregation. For years now I have heard
the word "Wait!" It rings in the ear of every Negro with piercing
familiarity. This "Wait" has almost always meant "Never."
We must come to see, with one of our distinguished jurists, that "justice
too long delayed is justice denied."
We have waited for
more than 340 years for our constitutional and God given rights. The nations of
Asia and Africa are moving with jetlike speed
toward gaining political independence, but we still creep at horse and buggy
pace toward gaining a cup of coffee at a lunch counter. Perhaps it is easy for
those who have never felt the stinging darts of segregation to say,
"Wait." But when you have seen vicious mobs lynch your mothers and
fathers at will and drown your sisters and brothers at whim; when you have seen
hate filled policemen curse, kick and even kill your black brothers and
sisters; when you see the vast majority of your twenty million Negro brothers
smothering in an airtight cage of poverty in the midst of an affluent society;
when you suddenly find your tongue twisted and your speech stammering as you
seek to explain to your six year old daughter why she can't go to the public
amusement park that has just been advertised on television, and see tears
welling up in her eyes when she is told that Funtown is closed to colored
children, and see ominous clouds of inferiority beginning to form in her little
mental sky, and see her beginning to distort her personality by developing an
unconscious bitterness toward white people; when you have to concoct an answer
for a five year old son who is asking: "Daddy, why do white people treat
colored people so mean?"; when you take a cross county drive and find it
necessary to sleep night after night in the uncomfortable corners of your
automobile because no motel will accept you; when you are humiliated day in and
day out by nagging signs reading "white" and "colored";
when your first name becomes "nigger," your middle name becomes
"boy" (however old you are) and your last name becomes
"John," and your wife and mother are never given the respected title
"Mrs."; when you are harried by day and haunted by night by the fact
that you are a Negro, living constantly at tiptoe stance, never quite knowing
what to expect next, and are plagued with inner fears and outer resentments;
when you are forever fighting a degenerating sense of
"nobodiness"--then you will understand why we find it difficult to
wait.
…
One who breaks an
unjust law must do so openly, lovingly, and with a willingness to accept the
penalty. I submit that an individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him
is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to
arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality
expressing the highest respect for law.
…
The Negro has many
pent up resentments and latent frustrations, and he must release them. So let
him march; let him make prayer pilgrimages to the city hall; let him go on
freedom rides -and try to understand why he must do so. If his repressed
emotions are not released in nonviolent ways, they will seek expression through
violence; this is not a threat but a fact of history (Letter 1-3)
King’s request to call
his wife, Coretta Scott King, who was at home in Atlanta recovering from the
birth of their fourth child, was denied. After she communicated her concern to
the Kennedy administration, Birmingham
officials permitted King to call home. Bail money was made available, and he
was released on 20 April 1963 (Birmingham Campaign 3).
Although King's
decision to seek arrest marked a turning point in his life as a leader, it did
little to increase support for the faltering ACMHR-SCLC campaign. …after a
month of exhaustive demonstrations, the stalemate with white authorities
suggested another Albany and the looming defeat
of the Birmingham
Campaign (Eskew 5).
Works cited:
“Birmingham
Campaign.” Stanford: The martin Luther King, Jr. Research and Education
Institute. Web. https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/encyclopedia/birmingham-campaign
“The Birmingham Desegregation
Campaign.” Armistad Digital
Resource. Web. http://www.amistadresource.org/civil_rights_era/birmingham_desegregation_campaign.html
Cozzens, Lisa.
“Birmingham .” Watson.org. Web.
http://www.watson.org/~lisa/blackhistory/civilrights-55-65/birming.html
Eskew,
Glenn T. “Birmingham Campaign of 1963.” Encyclopedia
of Alabama . Web.
http://www.encyclopediaofalabama.org/article/h-1358
Harris,
Joanna. “The 1963 Birmingham Campaign: Events & Impact.” Study.com. Web. https://study.com/academy/lesson/the-1963-birmingham-campaign-events-impact.html
"Letter from a Birmingham
Jail [King, Jr.]" African Studies Center
– University of Pennsylvania . Web.
https://www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/Letter_Birmingham.html
“No Easy Walk.”
Amazon AWS. Web.
http://wgbhprojects.s3.amazonaws.com/EYES%20ON%20THE%20PRIZE/Transcripts/EOTP-104-NoEasyWalk_TRANSCRIPT.pdf
Trueman, C.
N. “Birmingham 1963.” The
History Learning Site. Web. https://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/the-civil-rights-movement-in-america-1945-to-1968/birmingham-1963/
No comments:
Post a Comment