Frederick Douglass -- Getting the Vote
The Freedman’s Bureau was created in the United States
war department by an act of Congress March 3, 1865, to last one year, but was
continued until 1872 by later acts. It
was established partly to prevent Southerners from re-establishing some form of
slavery, partly to provide relief to needy blacks and whites in the conquered
South, and partly to take charge of lands confiscated in the South during the
war. “At the head of the bureau was a
commissioner, Gen. O. O. Howard, and under him in each southern state was an
assistant commissioner with a corps of local superintendents, agents and
inspectors. The officials had the
broadest possible authority in all matters that concerned the Negroes”
(Britannica 731).
Douglass’s son Charles had sent Douglass a letter in July
1867 that informed him that the Johnson Administration was considering naming
Douglass Commissioner of the Freedom’s Bureau.
Would he be interested in taking the position? Yes, he would! A black
man at the head of such a powerful government agency created, presumably,
to benefit the Negro in the South-what a giant symbolic stride toward racial
equality that would be! Then there was
the salary of $3,000 a year. But
Douglass felt uneasy about the offer. He
replied that he would take time to consider it before deciding.
What immediately
disturbed him about the offer was the unfavorable reference to the
incumbent. Douglass happened to know
something about General Oliver Otis Howard.
He knew as did every other informed Negro that the General’s record and
reputation were unblemished. Negroes as
well as whites held him in the highest esteem.
Even his enemies in government acknowledged that he was a “very good
sort of man.” Why would Andrew Johnson
want to removed the blameless General Howard and replace him with a Negro? Certainly not for any good reason, Douglass
thought. He had never been convinced by
any of Johnson’s assertions that he meant well toward Negroes (Bontemps
252).
Two weeks later Douglass rejected the offer, stating that he
“could not accept office with my present views of duty.” In a letter to a newspaper he said that he
did not want to be a part of any attempt to remove the General and he did not
wish to “place himself under any obligation to keep the peace with Andrew
Johnson” (Bontemps 253).
Andrew Johnson “was clever enough to see the advantages of
putting a gullible or flatterable black man in charge-nominally-while he
undermined a government program designed to assist black people. Douglass was flatterable, but not always
gullible. In his tough mind, he knew
that Johnson would not give him, or any other black man, the job if doing so
meant giving him also the power that should go with it” (McFeely 261).
Soon the main reason for Johnson’s job offer became known to
all. “The plan to replace Howard by a
prominent Negro was part of a larger scheme to get rid of (Radical Republican)
Secretary of War Stanton. Radicals could
not safely oppose the highest appointment ever offered a Negro in government,
and this circumstance was counted on to muffle their protests against the Stanton ouster’ (Bontemps
253), which Johnson soon after attempted.
Subsequently, the House of Representatives began impeachment proceedings
against the President.
Ottilia Assing (See “Ottilia Assing and Slavery in the
Territories” post, May 28, 2017) watched the impeachment trial of Andrew
Johnson during the spring of 1868 and savored every moment of it, until the
Senate’s vote to remove the President from office fell one vote short. She knew, however, that the Republican Party
would nominate Ulysses S. Grant as their Presidential candidate and that he
would most certainly win the election in November. Her friends, “real radicals,” had persuaded
her that Grant could be trusted to work diligently for the cause of racial
equality.
Douglass campaigned rigorously for the former general and
against his Democratic opponent, Horatio Seymour. He argued simply that the Democrats had
favored the rebellion and now opposed suffrage for the Negro. The Republicans had opposed the rebellion and
favored the latter. Grant, in the election,
received 450,000 Negro votes. He
received only 300,000 more votes than Seymour
in the entire election. Douglass
believed that the Republican Party owed his race a commitment to Negro
suffrage. In 1869 Congress “proposed a
constitution amendment to the effect that neither the national government nor
any state should be permitted to deny the ballot to a man because of his race
or color” (Bontemps 254). Douglass, of
course, urged its adoption during his unrelenting lecture tours. On March 30, 1870, the Fifteenth Amendment
received the number of state ratifications required to put it into the
Constitution, and many in the nation rejoiced.
The President wrote of its passage as “The most important ever that has
occurred since the nation came into life” (Bontemps 255). Its work done, the American Anti-Slavery
Society called its final meeting. All
that had been fought for for so many years now seemed won.
Works cited:
Bontempts, Arna, Free
at Last, the Life of Frederick Douglass, New York, Dodd, Mead &
Company, 1971. Print.
Encyclopedia
Britannica, Vol. 9, Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., Chicago , 1960. Print.
McFeely, William S. Frederick Douglass. New
York , W. W. Norton & Company, 1991. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment