Thomas Nelson -- Independence
A stout man of 38 years sat waiting to affix his signature
to a copy of the newly formed and approved Declaration of Independence. Richard Henry Lee, a delegate from Virginia,
had moved on June 7, 1776, that “these United Colonies are, and of right ought
to be, free and independent States …” The Second Continental Congress’s Committee
of the Whole had discussed Lee’s motion the following day and Monday, June 10,
before deciding to postpone final consideration until July 1. The middle colonies and South Carolina had not been ready to sanction
the final break; but -- the Committee had believed -- given time, they could be
persuaded. A committee, which included
Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, and John Adams, had consequently been
formed to write a declaration of independence. On July 2 a resolution for independence had
been adopted. On July 4 twelve colonies had
approved Jefferson ’s Declaration of
Independence. The New York
delegation had chosen not to vote. On
July 15 New York
had accepted the Declaration and Congress had ordered that it be engrossed on
parchment and signed by the members.
Thomas Nelson was one of the famous Virginia
delegation that had won so much praise from the pen of John Adams of Massachusetts . Washington, Henry, Pendleton, and Bland were
all missing from that first group of delegates who had come north in the spring
of 1775. Nelson was one of four new men
who had taken their places. Adams described him “as a fat men … He is a speaker, and
alert and lively for his weight.” Pennsylvania delegate
Benjamin Rush provided more information.
Rush wrote that Nelson is “a respectable country gentleman, with
excellent dispositions in public and private.
He was educated in England . He informed me that he was the only person
out of nine or ten Virginians that were sent with him to England for
education that had taken part in the American Revolution. The rest were all Tories” (McGee 224, 226).
Before affixing his signature Nelson very likely recalled his
position on independence during the previous twelve months.
He had decided early that hostilities had progressed too far
and that a final stand would have to be taken.
There remained, however, opposition to independence in Congress,
especially from New York , Pennsylvania ,
and Maryland . “But events were pushing the colonies in the
direction of independence whether all of them liked it or not. In Virginia the militia commanded by William
Woodford defeated a British force under [former Governor] Dunmore at Great
Bridge, forcing the noble lord to abandon Norfolk; in Canada the combined
American forces under Benedict Arnold and Richard Montgomery were repulsed
before Quebec on December 31 [1775]. These occurrences, coupled with a royal
proclamation of December 23 closing the colonies to all commerce as of March 1,
1776, made the breach between England and the colonies almost irreparable”
(Evans 54). On January 22 Nelson had
written his friend in Virginia, John Page, how he wished he knew “the
sentiments of our people upon the grand points of confederation and foreign
alliance, or, in other words, of independence … We cannot expect to form a
connexxion with any foreign power, as long as we have a womanish hankering
after Great Britain; and to be sure, there is not in nature a greater
absurdity, than to suppose we can have any affection for a people who are
carrying on the most savage war against us” (Sanderson 51).
Soon afterward, Thomas Paine’s famous Common Sense had been published. Nelson had sent a copy home to his friend,
Thomas Jefferson, at Monticello .
Here was a stirring piece of work that
Nelson must have embraced heartily. No
doubt he had hoped it would convince many in the states of the folly of striving
for peaceful conciliation with Great
Britain .
There were still many men in the Congress who needed to alter their
thinking. In February Nelson had written
Page an intense letter that expressed his frustration.
“Independence ,
confederation, and foreign alliance are as formidable to some of the Congress,
I fear a majority, as an apparition to a weak, enervated woman. Would you think that we have some among us,
who still expect honourable proposals from the administration? By heavens, I am an infidel in politics, for
I do not believe, were you to bet a thousand pounds per scruple for honour at
the court of Britain, that you would get as many as would amount to an
ounce. If terms should be proposed, they
will savour so much of despotism, that America cannot accept them. We are now carrying on a war and no war. They seize our property wherever they find
it, either by land or sea; and we hesitate to retaliate, because we have a few
friends in England
who have hips. Away with such squeamishness,
say I” (Sanderson 52-53).
Upon returning to Virginia in March to spend time with his
family and to attend to business matters, he had discovered that a majority of
the colony’s population favored independence.
The Virginia Gazette had
“expressed the sentiment of many when, soon after his arrival, it declared: ”If
we cannot enjoy the privileges of Englishmen when connected with them, let us
instantly break off to them” (Evans 55).
On May 6, one hundred twenty-eight delegates had convened in
Williamsburg to
conduct the final business of the soon to be replaced House of Burgesses. The Convention had elected Edmund Pendleton to
be its president. Nelson had been
appointed to the important Committee on Privileges and Elections. Jefferson
had urged Nelson to raise in committee the issue of independence. He had done so in his numerous communications
with other delegates. To one delegate
(not identified) he had written “having weighed the arguments on both sides, I
am clearly of the opinion that we must, as we value the liberties of America,
or even her existence, without a moment’s delay, declare independence.” There was no need to determine the opinions of
France and Spain . France would benefit from the
separation. Fear in the minds of some
that England
would give territory to either country on the condition that it not support the
colonies was “chimerical.” Nelson
declared that the military “would abandon the colors if independence were not
declared. … the spirit of the people
(except a very few in these lower parts, whose little blood has been sucked out
by mosquitoes), cry out for this declaration” (Evans 56).
Quite surprisingly, Patrick Henry had been hesitant. He had feared precisely what Nelson had
dismissed – “that England
would call on some European ally with the promise of a part of the colonies as
a reward for helping to subdue them.”
Henry had believed that an alliance with France
or Spain
had to be affected before separation could be declared. When he had recognized that “he would lose
much of his support unless he lead the movement [for immediate independence],
he took the initiative, allies or no allies” (Evans 57). Consequently, he had devised a plan. He would persuade Nelson to introduce a
motion for independence and Henry would then work for its acceptance. The plan had been effected.
Edmund Randolph had written later that Nelson “affected
nothing of oratory, except what ardent feelings might inspire, and
characteristic of himself he had no fears of his own with which to temporize …”
(McGee 226-227). “He passed over the probabilities of foreign aid, stepped
lightly on the difficulties of procuring military stores and the inexperience
of officers and soldiers, but pressed a declaration of independence upon what,
with him, were incontrovertible grounds; that we were oppressed; had humbly
supplicated a redress of grievances, which had been refused with insult; and to
return from battle against the sovereign with the cordiality of subjects was
absurd” (Evans 57).
On May 17 Nelson had left for Philadelphia with the Virginia
delegation carrying the resolutions that the Virginia convention had agreed
upon., to wit that Congress “‘declare the United colonies free and independence
states, absolved from all allegiance to, or dependence upon, the crown or
parliament of Great Britain’” (Evans 58).
Now, August 2, Thomas Nelson affixed his signature to the
official document.
Nelson had much to lose financially. He had written to a Virginia colleague three months earlier that
“no man on the continent will sacrifice more than myself by separation” (Evans
56). Yet quite early he had stood forcefully
for independence. He, like every
delegate to the Continental Congress, also knew the personal danger of this
position. What real chance did a band of
disjointed states, challenging the immense power of Great Britain , have of
prevailing? It behooved Nelson to work assiduously
to achieve that outcome.
Works cited:
Evans, Emory G. Thomas Nelson of Yorktown :
Revolutionary Virginian. The University
Press of Virginia , Charlottesville , Virginia ,
1975. Print.
McGee, Dorothy Horton.
Famous Signers of the Declaration. New
York : Dodd, Mead & Company, 1955. Print.
John Sanderson, Biography
of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence, Second edition. Philadelphia :
William Brown and Charles Peters, 1828. V.
Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment